≡ Menu

Aerodynamic Tiny House by Tiny Heirloom

This is the Aerodynamic Tiny House on Wheels.

It’s designed and built by Tiny Heirloom in Portland, Oregon.

Please enjoy, learn more, and re-share below. Thank you!

Aerodynamic Tiny House by Tiny Heirloom

Aerodynamic Tiny House by Tiny Heirloom 001

© Tiny Heirloom

Aerodynamic Tiny House by Tiny Heirloom 002

Aerodynamic Tiny House by Tiny Heirloom 003

Aerodynamic Tiny House by Tiny Heirloom 004

Aerodynamic Tiny House by Tiny Heirloom 005

Aerodynamic Tiny House by Tiny Heirloom 006

Aerodynamic Tiny House by Tiny Heirloom 007

Aerodynamic Tiny House by Tiny Heirloom 008

Aerodynamic Tiny House by Tiny Heirloom 009

Aerodynamic Tiny House by Tiny Heirloom 010

Aerodynamic Tiny House by Tiny Heirloom 011

© Tiny Heirloom

Please learn more using the resources below. Thanks.

Resources

You can share this tiny house with your friends and family for free using the e-mail and social media re-share buttons below. Thanks.

If you enjoyed this tiny house you’ll LOVE our Free Daily Tiny House Newsletter with even more! Thank you!

More Like This: Explore our Tiny Houses Section

See The Latest: Go Back Home to See Our Latest Tiny Houses

The following two tabs change content below.

Alex

Alex is a contributor and editor for TinyHouseTalk.com and the always free Tiny House Newsletter. He has a passion for exploring and sharing tiny homes (from yurts and RVs to tiny cabins and cottages) and inspiring simple living stories. We invite you to send in your story and tiny home photos too so we can re-share and inspire others towards a simple life too. Thank you!




{ 15 comments… add one }
  • Maggie September 12, 2016, 2:25 pm

    No mention of what makes this aerodynamic. No pictures that would give a hint either. Would like the title of article to be explained here, and then choose whether to go to website of builder.

    • Derek September 12, 2016, 3:31 pm

      I agree. Don’t bother looking on their site either because it only has the same pictures and no explanation.

      • Sondra September 12, 2016, 3:48 pm

        They had this on TV, they put a stainless steel type cone on the entire front of the trailer where the trailer hitch is, pretty ingenious !

        • Eric September 12, 2016, 8:52 pm

          Which is precisely what I have been saying in previous posts, especially about the big flat front THes that are going to be towed on a regular basis. Small up front cost for big ongoing savings in fuel.

  • Scott September 12, 2016, 3:26 pm

    I understand why you don’t show any exterior shots to explain (visually) why this is aerodynamic, you just show the same pics as the manufacturer. But they don’t have any pics or explanation…or floor plans of any sort.
    They must ONLY do custom builds. Never any plans done the same way twice.

  • tanya hohe September 12, 2016, 5:08 pm

    Love the bedroom in this one!! Would be perfect if I were single, even being single I probably wouldn’t want eveyone being able to see my “bedroom” lol

    • Eric September 12, 2016, 8:55 pm

      Could always have a pull down blind to cover the (in my case anyway) disaster zone of the sleeping quarters. Cheap easy fix to the problem.

  • Larry September 12, 2016, 6:31 pm

    “Aerodynamic?” Really?

    Nice way to mistitle an article, and mislead a reader!

    P.S.

    The two exterior photos show that this “tiny house” isn’t “aerodynamic,” in the least!

    • Alex September 14, 2016, 5:59 pm

      Our bad, Larry, was not meaning to mislead you or anyone, that’s just what they named the house :/

  • Richard September 12, 2016, 10:04 pm

    When we watched the program..this 100 sq foot tiny home cost 90,000

  • coffeewitholiver September 12, 2016, 10:07 pm

    I love the rustic and yet polished look of this home. I do think it would have been helpful to show the front exterior to show why it’s aerodynamic, to help people visualize. But from a purely aesthetic viewpoint, it’s a lovely post.

  • oxide September 13, 2016, 10:01 am

    I find this to be dark and unappealing. It’s certainly not practical for a full-time house (clothing storage? washer/dryer? microwave?). And like all THOWs, you still have no land and you’re still tied to a water supply. $90K is a steep price tag for what you’re not getting, but if you have that kind of large lying around gathering dust… well…

    • sc September 13, 2016, 11:52 am

      Its not meant to be a full time for the couple who own it. I might be remembering wrong, but I think they each own their own house in San Francisco, so they have the money. They just want to visit and travel in style.

Leave a Comment

Next post:

Previous post:






New Graphic