≡ Menu

Studio-style Mini Box Tiny Cabin

This is the studio-style Mini Box Tiny Cabin.

It’s designed and built by IdeaBox.

Please enjoy, learn more, and re-share below. Thank you!

The Mini Box Tiny Home by IdeaBox


Images © IdeaBox.us











Images © IdeaBox.us


  • 400 sq. ft.
  • Park model
  • Starts at $87,000

Please learn more using the resources below. Thanks.


You can share this tiny house with your friends and family for free using the e-mail and social media re-share buttons below. Thanks.

If you enjoyed this tiny house you’ll LOVE our Free Daily Tiny House Newsletter with even more! Thank you!

More Like This: Explore our Tiny Houses Section

See The Latest: Go Back Home to See Our Latest Tiny Houses

The following two tabs change content below.


Alex is a contributor and editor for TinyHouseTalk.com and the always free Tiny House Newsletter. He has a passion for exploring and sharing tiny homes (from yurts and RVs to tiny cabins and cottages) and inspiring simple living stories. We invite you to send in your story and tiny home photos too so we can re-share and inspire others towards a simple life too. Thank you!

{ 16 comments… add one }
  • ZACHARY E MOHRMANN September 26, 2016, 11:35 am

    Mini is not on my list of words to describe this tiny house.. At 400 sq. ft. it leaves the definition far from the imagination of the usual description of a tiny house.. As is the price of $85,000.00 ..!

  • JT September 26, 2016, 12:12 pm

    Nice for a getaway. Having to walk through the bedroom to get to the bathroom? Probably not having visitors.

    • Large Marge September 26, 2016, 12:43 pm

      Reading your comment, our thoughts immediately playfully went to ‘overnight guests of the opposite gender’.

      Of course, just for a cuddle. Nothing untoward, naturally…

  • Bill Burgess September 26, 2016, 1:05 pm

    Weird…In the same square footage I do 1.5 bath,w/d, d/w, separate living/kitchen/bedrooms(+loft) but then I believe in doing what you need and not much more…I suppose being in the Senior design mode I am seeing things different but we ARE on a Tiny House site. At my 4 Fathoms Designs pages in in the books I write I try to make function as well as aesthetics count for each inch of space. Most people have never lived in an RV for years to experience “NEED”…

    • rick September 27, 2016, 9:44 am

      but not everybody is trying to cram every possible option into a tiny space. this looks like a very comfortable tiny cottage.

  • Nanny September 26, 2016, 3:38 pm

    Love these homes especially the Northwest and Aktiv. livable, realistic, plenty of room to cook and entertain. Nice to have different designs of the exterior to choose from.

  • Vanyel September 26, 2016, 5:31 pm

    Sometimes a little luxury never hurt anyone (especially for same price). I love knowing what you can with a little extra. The amount of books I have I need wallspace, so many tiny houses just can’t cut it. This is nice.

  • gale September 26, 2016, 5:33 pm

    Pricy but lots of ideas for free. Love it.

  • kim September 26, 2016, 5:49 pm

    I love it. Its perfect. I have been wanting a 400 – 500 sq. ft. for the last few years. This one is beautiful.

  • ROSEE September 26, 2016, 5:50 pm

    I like this set up, just the right size for someone like me!

  • kim September 26, 2016, 5:50 pm

    If I could find property to put this on, I would buy it.

  • AVD September 26, 2016, 8:11 pm

    Pretty nice non-trailer house.

    Just one safety nit-pick. Someone is going to get seriously injured when they walk into the out-tilting awning windows at the deck. An out-tilting hopper window would reduce the injury potential.

    Better yet, and in-tilt hopper window over the W/D cabinet in the bath area and another one next to the sliding deck door in the “Great Room”

    If you really want to call it a Great Room, then ditch the in-swinging man-door that costs a ton and does zero for livability and function of the living / kitchen area. The door also hurts the budget.

    Lastly, steal a foot or two out of the bedroom width to make the the living area more livable. Also ditch the too trendy and improperly used barn door. A single moderately wide pocket door near the foot-end of the bed would make for a nicer living area and possibly a better sleeping area.

    Just wondering – do any of the other readers think that the nice exterior perspective drawing does not come close to matching the photos?

    It is not nice to fool prospective buyers with bogus drawings.


    • Bill Burgess September 27, 2016, 3:02 pm

      AVD I suppose showing the backside of the structure rather than the front side is why you were thrown off on the pic. If you flip the print you can see the doors and windows line up better. But what I design is more cost effective at 4Fathoms Designs.

  • Francesca September 27, 2016, 12:02 am

    I love this house! But I do agree that having to walk thru the bedroom to get to the bathroom is not optimal. I definitely recommend checking out their website (Ideabox)… they have several models, all sizes… one model – I think it’s called the Northwest – is the same size as this one, but has a much better layout.

  • oxide September 27, 2016, 2:16 pm

    The layout is not good. You should put the kitchen and bathroom back-to-back to avoid extra plumbing runs and save money. And $85K is just too expensive for 400 sq ft. Those houses in Detroit had a better layout for 300 sf ft and cost only $50K.

    • rick September 27, 2016, 2:52 pm

      but to put them back to back would eliminate the possibility of windows on the end wall of the kitchen and put the potentially stinky bathroom right next to where you are cooking and eating…if it were going to be my tiny house, that would be a deal breaker. i’d prefer that the occasional guest go through my bedroom. And 87k may sound like a lot but that’s only $217/sq. ft. and where I live in Maine, that’s what a very basic house with simple finishes starts at if you’re doing anything but a “builder special”.

      I personally really like this tiny house.

Leave a Comment

Next post:

Previous post:

New Graphic