When you ask Simon Dale why he’s doing what he’s doing, he has a simple answer: it’s fun!

He has nearly completed building his second unique, sustainable, low-impact home in Wales, designed to nourish the residents as well the natural environment.

Dale has a more down to earth response to why he builds the tiny sustainable houses that have come to be known as hobbit homes.

“Our society is almost entirely dependent on the availability of increasing amounts of fossil fuel energy,” Dale writes, and if we don’t start drastically decreasing the energy we use we as a world will be faced with an “ecological catastrophe.”

The method of reducing consumption that Dale is passionate about is building homes that respect, repair and connect with the immediate natural environment.

hobbit house by simon dale small natural sustainable homes 1   Small, Natural, Straw Bale Home that You Can Build for $4,627
Photos Courtesy of Simon Dale and Low Impact Woodland Home

The first natural home he built, which also happened to be the first major construction project he’d ever tackled, is tucked in the side of a quaint hill in Wales, is wood heated and solar powered, and was built in less than six months for under $5000.

I encourage to learn how by checking out the rest of the article, photos, and videos:

hobbit house by simon dale small natural sustainable homes 07   Small, Natural, Straw Bale Home that You Can Build for $4,627

Dale built this house primarily by himself, though family, friends and passersby often leant a hand.

The Dale family was able to move into their cozy hillside home after just four months of construction and Dale says he spent £3000, or $4627 US dollars.

hobbit house by simon dale small natural sustainable homes 03   Small, Natural, Straw Bale Home that You Can Build for $4,627

He used oak thinnings from the area around the building site to build the house frame. Reclaimed wood served as a low cost and environmentally friendly flooring.

All wiring and plumbing supplies plus all the windows used in the house were salvaged nearby. He experimented successfully with straw bales as insulation both in the walls and in the floor.

A composting toilet, turf roof, wood burning stove keep the house sustainable and comfortable.

hobbit house by simon dale small natural sustainable homes 02   Small, Natural, Straw Bale Home that You Can Build for $4,627

hobbit house by simon dale small natural sustainable homes 06   Small, Natural, Straw Bale Home that You Can Build for $4,627

hobbit house by simon dale small natural sustainable homes 01   Small, Natural, Straw Bale Home that You Can Build for $4,627

hobbit house by simon dale small natural sustainable homes 04   Small, Natural, Straw Bale Home that You Can Build for $4,627

Simon Dale, like many tiny house builders, makes a point to say that anyone can build this kind of house if they have a mind to.

Video Tour and Construction Process Overview of Simon’s Tiny Mud House

Length: 4:18

Interview with Simon Dale on Sustainable Living

Length: 1:46

Part two, length: 2:24

Just three years ago, Dale had never built a house before and had limited construction experience.

He relied on a chainsaw, hammer, chisel and little else to build a cozy, sustainable Welsh home for his family. “It’s fun,” he says.

And then takes it a bit deeper. “Living your own life in your own way is rewarding. Following our dreams keeps our souls alive.”

hobbit house by simon dale small natural sustainable homes 05   Small, Natural, Straw Bale Home that You Can Build for $4,627
Photos Courtesy of Simon Dale and Low Impact Woodland Home

If you enjoyed this post and know someone who might like it too, “Like” it on Facebook and share it with your friends using the buttons below. Thank you!

Written by Newt Stremple for Tiny House Talk

Source: http://www.simondale.net/house/index.htm

Share ==>facebook   Small, Natural, Straw Bale Home that You Can Build for $4,627twitter   Small, Natural, Straw Bale Home that You Can Build for $4,627email   Small, Natural, Straw Bale Home that You Can Build for $4,627
The following two tabs change content below.
   Small, Natural, Straw Bale Home that You Can Build for $4,627

Alex

Alex has been living in small spaces for more than 7 years, he's the founding editor of TinyHouseTalk.com, and has passion for exploring and sharing tiny homes (from yurts and RVs to cabins and cottages) and inspiring simple living stories. Send in your story and tiny home photos so we can share and inspire others towards simplicity.

Facebook Comments

comments


{ 31 comments }

  • Ryan

    You were right, Alex, I totally dig this. I’d love to build something this way. What a cool home.

    Reply
    • Alex

      I had a feeling you’d enjoy it. Can’t wait until you build one. :)

      Reply
  • Kat

    This has to be the best underground home I’ve seen – and I have looked at a lot of them over the years. I love the “hobbit” look of it. If you are going to go underground, why make it look like a “normal” home? – You’ve got to love the fantasy feeling. It looks like a happy home!

    Reply
    • Alex

      Glad you like it Kat, I thought it was awesome too. I imagine that a home like this would help you feel very connected to this world, much like an animal. This is probably how it’s “supposed to” be. Natural wood can work too, though. But this… this is like a human nest. Must make for a very good foundation for a happy, healthy family. Makes me happy just looking at it.

      Reply
  • jamie & shawn

    Isn’t that a fascinating house!? I especially like the comment, I totally dig this…it’s totally apropos! After building in places as liberal as Maine I’m utterly baffled as to how something like this would ever get past the nose of a code inspector here in the States. In Washington state (our home) it’d be downright impossible. The biggest concern (for us) would be moisture control; the details of this clever place must be so interesting, it’s simply brilliant! Hey, thanks for sending it along…

    Reply
    • Alex

      Happy you liked it, Jamie and Shawn. Sad that you have to head the opposite direction of civilization to build and live in something like this but great that some folks are still making it happen here and there. Very inspiring!

      Reply
    • Sylvie

      There is plenty of moisture in Wales, where this house was built, but they have made it work. You might get it through the codes by labeling it an “earth-bermed” house. Those are currently being built within the US. And cob is similar to straw bale houses which now have codes that cover construction.

      Reply
  • frank

    It’s nice but a handful of people living on acreages is not going to put a dent in society’s dependence on fossil fuel. At worse this is just urban sprawl under the cloak of sustainability. To really reduce energy use we need to focus on energy-efficient multifamily buildings (shared walls minimize heat loss/gain) close to urban centers and mass-transit (to minimize energy used for transportation).

    Reply
    • Alex

      Thanks, Frank

      Reply
    • Theresa

      Too true. It’s wonderful, but not an across the board fix. There isn’t enough space on earth to allow everyone to live like that. The amount of forest needed to build and sustain us like individualy wrapped slices of cheese would kill the forests of the world.

      Reply
      • Jeannie

        Exactly, Theresa, hear hear! Although I love the house and applaud the sentiments, having a home like this is a certain kind of luxury in itself, not a contribution to the world.

        Reply
      • Heather

        This is a straw man argument. Most people seem to like living cheek by jowl with their neighbors in towns and cities and are simply not cut out for rural life. They aren’t going to want their own slice of forest, anyhow. This doesn’t mean it’s not a contribution to find ways to enable those of us who enjoy a rural life and go quietly out of our minds in crowded conditions to find better ways of doing so–especially ways of doing so on less money, as finding a way of earning income vs quality of life is always a juggling act in a rural area.

        Reply
      • Chris Sievert

        Theresa not enough resources for everyone to live like this? The Earth currently supports over 7 BILLION People… It tooks tens fo thousands of years to reach 1 billion in 1804 then took another 123 years to reach 2 billion in 1927 33 years to reach 3 Billion in 1960 14 years to reach 4 billion in 1974 (thats was I started to pay attention to the worlds Population) And when the world started paying attention and Population growth finally slowed…. unfortunately most of it was from FAMINE… so 13 years to reach 5 billion then another 12 years to reach 6 billion… then 11 years to reach 7 billion in 2011…. Why are humans so stupid not to see a COLLAPSE of our Population coming very soon? We reached the point where increases in fossil fuels isn’t producing enough food to feed everyone BORN since the 1970′s… Most 1st world countries population do not realise accidents aren’t the #1 killer worldwide like it is in their Country… It’s STARVATION!

        Reply
    • Heather

      No. So-called “smart growth” high density housing has much to do with several health crises we are slamming into. Having everyone live in what are, frankly, slightly more self-contained dorm rooms is fine for those without kids, but it’s a setup that means that kids CANNOT spend as much time outside as they need to for their own health and development. Why? Because, unlike, decades ago, you can’t just let them play in the street. Any parent of a kid under about 10 or 12 knows that they either need to have their own fenced yard or be out with the kid every minute–or risk harm to the kid, or, if the parent deems that the kid is okay by themselves, some busybody neighbor calling CPS. The upshot of this is that NO parent has time to spend hours each day outside just watching their kids and not getting anything else done, so the kids are parked in front of the babble box indoors. High density housing is bad for children’s health.

      Reply
      • Chris Sievert

        So true “modern urban” living is horrible for our children. Only one of my stepdaughters who was raised by her Grandmother out in the county has made it through “childhood into Adulthood” The other 2 who lived in Atlanta and never got to play outside and at 19 and 21 are still children and have no clue what being an Adult is about…..

        Reply
  • Kevin

    Intriguing and whimsical… absolutely, but at $92.00 a square foot this would not be considered cheap in my book. A simple 12 x 20 tiny house would run just over 22K at that rate. Balancing ones wants and needs, while still achieving the perfect look should be possible for half that. Check out earthbag construction, it’s possible to create a similar look and feel to this utilizing them. Most projects are reported costing as little as $10 – 15.00 per sq ft to build.

    Reply
    • Alex

      Thanks, Kevin, I’ll check that out.

      Reply
    • Chris Sievert

      It sure looks bigger than 50.29 square feet. I’m thinking the decimal point is off on the price per sq foot… $4627/$92 per sq ft is just 10ftx5ft and change….

      Reply
      • Kim Tripp

        Alex,
        Is Chris right? I had wondered the same thing when looking at the pictures. At $4600 total cost and $92 per square foot this would be a 50 sq. ft. house. It CERTAINLY looks bigger than that…should it be $9.20 per sq. ft.?
        Would love some clarification, as I find this home to be delightful and we have some lovely hills on our piece of utopia …(we call it Longstay…because that is our plan…to stay for a long time :) ) in North West Michigan that would lend themselves quite well to this building style.
        Thanks and keep up the good inspirational work!

        Reply
    • De

      My husband and I are building an earthbag home in a rural community in Michigan. It is not as cheap a some would think. Our permits, engineering fees (required by the building inspector) and the requirements of the engineer have cost us more than $15 per square foot. I do not have any regrets so far other than applying for a building permit. It will probably cost us more like $60 per square foot. The beams and concrete alone are the majority of the budget. We are hoping to make the cabinetry and windows ourselves but reclaimed wood is so expensive and are the doors and windows going to be efficient? We struggle trying to find good info about how to build a window. Are we hurting ourselves by trying to reduce our footprint? I know we will save money in the long run but up front is killing us. I wanted to be off the grid but I can’t find a system cheaper than about $20000/30000. Out house is only 1000 square feet. Why does doing the right thing for the planet have to come at such a hefty price. I often wonder if we should have gone smaller, but for us…1000 square feet is a big deal.

      Reply
  • Randall

    We will move to another energy source as soon as it gets too expensive to use what we are currently using. It is human nature to go with what costs us the least. Once fossil fuels are completely depleted we will move on to something else.

    Sorry if this offends but it is the truth and everyone can rail against it all they like it makes it no less true. In the mean time getting back to the land is a desirable and laudable goal regardless of whether you think climate change is a result of cosmic rays or man made causes. I believe all of us are way too removed from our food sources as evidenced by the fact that people are willing to buy the low quality of food that they sell in the grocery store. Again going toward what is cheapest. Making choices that are better for the body and the environment is the best way to live at any rate. Organic just taste better and is more nutritious for the body. Truly free range eggs have mere nutrients and taste better, grass fed beef is more nutritious, and organically grown may not look as pretty but it definitely better for you.
    The tiny house will catch on because it is an alternative way that is cheaper and allows you to get closer to the earth and live more organically.

    Reply
    • Alex

      Thanks, Randall, great points.

      Reply
    • Chris Sievert

      2011 we surpassed 7 BILLION people… The Earth cannot sustain that population without fossil fuels. It fueled the boom in population 1 Billion souls in 1804 6 billion more in 109 years…. All because of fuel based Agriculture… first commercial steam engine was invented in 1781…. And Populations exploded due to “cheap” energy to grow and transport crops….

      Reply
  • Theresa

    Wow, to live in such a place of beauty! I would love to look out my front door and see that horizon. I love this concept and have dreamed of it for many years, but it’s not do-able without relocating, which is not an option for me. I’ll keep dreaming.

    Reply
  • John

    Are bugs and water a problem?

    Reply
    • Carol

      How about mice? We have mice here in this rural area.

      Reply
  • Danny

    great house i cant think of a nicer home to live in. how hard is it to get planning for such a home ?

    Reply
  • La Segunda

    Just saw this one for the first time. I love it! What a beautiful house. Thanks for posting it, Alex.

    Reply
  • Lisa

    Although the house is interesting and looks comfortable I don’t think most municipalities would allow this type of dwelling. Getting a permit would probably be out of the question, which means the owner could be forced by the authorities to destroy their home. The price per square foot is high and is comparable in price to building using standard construction. Perhaps building codes are not as stringent where this family lives.

    Reply
  • Tom

    “Frank should live in an ant hill, that would would really reduce the carbon footprint.” This place is fantastic, I really don’t know how you managed to build such a complex assortment of angles and still manage such a comforting flow to your home, your kids are beautiful! Tom.

    Reply

Leave a Comment